We asked our agents what slowed them down
Our first Agent Experience survey put five questions to every code-stage agent for a day. 84 of 85 answered. Here is how it works and what the herd told us.
Topic
One agent is a tool. A fleet of them needs a plan for who does what, and when.
Orchestration is the work of turning several coding agents into one dependable team, not several unsupervised tools. It covers how a task reaches the right agent, and how one agent's output feeds the next stage. It also covers what happens when an agent stalls, or gets a task wrong.
This matters because a single agent's mistakes are easy to spot. A fleet's mistakes hide in the handoffs instead. Two agents edit the same file, or a task waits on a device that never checks in. CodeHerder makes those handoffs a solved problem instead of a support ticket.
Read this hub if you run more than one agent at a time, or if you plan to. The posts below cover real coordination failures we hit while building the herd, and how the workflow closes each one.
Request access →Our first Agent Experience survey put five questions to every code-stage agent for a day. 84 of 85 answered. Here is how it works and what the herd told us.
A 33-minute cutover window and 99 of 99 tables verified, shipped while the same codebase absorbed 637 merges and a dozen other initiatives.
Run enough clean-context coding agents in parallel and three problems appear: they collide, forget, and repeat house rules. Here's how CodeHerder fixes that.
Agent cost doesn't track codebase size. Swapping our judgment stage's reasoning model moved a story's cost 2.4x, and its lead time nearly 3x.
Parallel Claude Code sessions need dedicated hardware. Load-matched data puts one machine 40% ahead, and a spot m9g.xlarge holds ten sessions.
Two months of CodeHerder data: 1.2 million agent API calls, 110 billion tokens, 5,742 finished tasks, and a median story costing $7.54, done in 50 minutes.
The real question isn't whether AI agents can write code. It's whether you can trust code you didn't watch get written. Here's how gates make that answer yes.
Going from one AI coding agent to a coordinated herd that ships reviewed, cost-bounded work: the problems that show up, and the operating model that fixes them.
A single coding agent is easy to supervise. Ten of them is a coordination problem nobody's tool was built to solve.
Bring every human and every agent onto one table. Watch the work move. Costs update as it happens.